home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2421>
- <title>
- Oct. 28, 1991: Truths in The Ruins
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Oct. 28, 1991 Ollie North:"Reagan Knew Everything"
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 104
- Truths in The Ruins
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Lance Morrow
- </p>
- <p> America is still too young to have convincing ruins.
- Instead of admiring the tumbled stones of their former
- civilizations, Americans can only return to their memorable
- fiascoes, where they can weep and think of Ozymandias, king of
- kings. They can revisit Watergate and Vietnam, for example, or
- penetrate to the remoter pageants of McCarthyism or the
- stock-market crash of 1929. Poking around in the remnants of
- disaster can tell you where you have been and what you have been
- capable of.
- </p>
- <p> Americans in the future may enjoy replaying the fiasco of
- the Thomas confirmation hearings: primal, defining national
- theater. The drama had layers--legal, political, cultural,
- racial, ethical, sexual. The hearings were a bad moment for
- middle-aged white men. The Senate Judiciary Committee sat
- arrayed in its Caucasian glory, like Muppets of Bomfog and
- Claghorn, each Senator more confused and senescent and miserable
- and lost to pomposity than the last--a row of flushed egos
- that said goodbye to dignity and intelligence sometime during
- the Eisenhower years.
- </p>
- <p> But in this drama the elected Senators did not represent
- America. Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill did. The soap opera that
- brought them together was as sleazy, corrupt and stupid as much
- of the nation's life has become. But the business touched deep
- matters. It was about man and woman, about sex and power, about
- ambition and desire. The hearings, almost a new art form,
- commingled private tragedy, public farce, office mini-series,
- and ideological bonfire.
- </p>
- <p> The most terrible of the American ruins is slavery, folly
- of follies. It has left its living cinders all over the
- geographical and moral landscape: in the South Bronx and South
- Side Chicago, in bigoted hearts and in the despairs and
- self-contempt of those left in the ruins.
- </p>
- <p> The importance of the Thomas hearings may have been more
- in the area of race than that of sex. The issue of sexual
- harassment came to no resolution there, so the aftermath on that
- score remains full of glaring anger. But the Thomas proceedings
- had an unexpected cleansing power where race is concerned. The
- antagonists were black. The drama was universal. The crime of
- racism is to deny the humanity of people with skin of a
- different color. Tolerance arises from a recognition of oneself
- in others, from seeing in a separate being all one's own
- possibilities, weaknesses, appetites, loves, lapses,
- brutalities, decencies. The leading players in the Thomas drama,
- and many in the supporting cast, were accomplished, gifted,
- attractive, ambitious, complicated Americans--and in this
- case, incidentally, African Americans. The hearings called forth
- a procession of people diverse and successful in ways not
- normally visible to white America.
- </p>
- <p> No stereotypes this time. No Cosby, Oprah, Willie Horton,
- Michael Jackson, Michael Jordan, Jesse Jackson. The black
- nominee was a conservative, not a predictable character with a
- predictable party line. What's this? Blacks are different from
- one another? Think different thoughts? Men and women, of
- whatever race, could not begin to search for the truth in the
- case without looking into themselves.
- </p>
- <p> Mystery hates the relentless predictabilities of dogma. It
- was a mystery that was on display before the Senate Judiciary
- Committee. That part of the truth was available to anyone whose
- mind was not lost in dense preconceptions. Politics and ideology
- have their organizational uses but are in general the enemies
- of deeper human truth. According to the polls, Americans around
- the country did not subscribe to the ideological conclusion to
- which so many in the women's movement leaped--the appalling
- syllogism that: 1) sexual harassment is horrible and widespread
- (it has happened to me and to many I know); 2) Anita Hill (and
- only Hill, but that's enough because that's the way harassment
- happens) says he did it; therefore 3) Clarence Thomas is guilty
- as charged (without trial), should be kept off the Supreme
- Court, and bears the monstrous guilt of all men everywhere, so
- now that he is on the court all his future decisions, including
- any possible opinions on Roe v. Wade, are illegitimate, the
- product of his sick mind. And by extension, all future
- decisions of this conservative Supreme Court affecting women are
- contaminated by what Anita Hill claims to have happened years
- ago between a man and a woman in an office--words about pubic
- hair on a Coke can and about a porn star with a large member.
- Ideology bludgeons the novelistic truth of character into its
- own preconceptions.
- </p>
- <p> Something is missing here, something we will never know.
- But frothing ideology will not tell us: if Clarence Thomas is
- a conservative, that does not make him a sexual harasser. What
- he may or may not decide about Roe v. Wade has no bearing upon
- what Anita Hill claims about his conduct. Sometimes men
- sexually harass vulnerable women. Women may have predatory
- agendas too. Not all women are innocent, vulnerable victims. And
- sometimes men are monsters. Reality is rich and impish and
- asymmetrical. It laughs at manifestos.
- </p>
- <p> After Clarence Thomas finished the first round of
- confirmation hearings, I would have voted against him on the
- grounds that he simply did not know enough--too strange and
- green, I thought, too many vectors in his character firing off
- in different directions. I could see a black nationalist inside
- him fighting it out with a Reaganite. But last week I would have
- taken a chance and voted in his favor. His life is beginning
- now. It belongs entirely to him, I surmise, for the first time.
- He will not be the Justice that ideologues of either side have
- predicted. He will surprise them all.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-